Blog Layout

Determining the Category of Water Damage Part 1

Jason Yost • December 7, 2022

Determining the Category of Water Damage Part 1

Preliminary Determination vs. Assessment & Testing

When a water damage restoration company responds to a call for service, one of the first things they attempt to do is determine if the water is contaminated. This is called a preliminary determination inspection, and, in the water damage restoration industry, they Categorize water damages as one of the following: 

  • The first is called Category 1 and means the water comes from a “clean” source (e.g., water from the kitchen sink or its water supply line) and has remained clean. Category 1 water is safe to handle and process (i.e., the water damage technician can go about drying the structure without concern of the water causing disease or serious illness or death).
  • Category 2 water isn’t clean, but it’s not pathogenic or toxigenic, either. It does have the potential to cause disease if ingested or absorbed (e.g., through cuts), so, for this reason, there are special procedures that a water damage restoration technician must employ when addressing such situations, for the safety and health of themselves and other building occupants.
  • Category 3 water is grossly contaminated and can contain pathogenic, toxigenic, or other harmful agents. These agents can cause serious illness and, even, death to those exposed to the contaminated water; as a result, these types of water damages require more complex and costly procedures and systems than those employed in Category 1 and 2 water damage restoration projects. The purpose of such procedures and systems is to assure worker and other building occupants' health while protecting non-impacted areas while work is performed that will return the indoor environment to its normal ecological disposition.
water damaged home

In some situations, it’s easy to determine whether the water is grossly contaminated (e.g., when the source is known to come from a sewage line backup and sewage-based contamination is visible); in other cases, it isn’t that easy. For example, the water’s cleanliness can be influenced by things like (1) the bacterial quality of the finished water at the source, (2) temperature, (3) residence time, (4) presence or absence of a disinfectant residual, (5) construction materials, (6) surface-to-volume ration, (7) flow conditions at the source and through construction materials, (8) the availability of nutrients for growth, (9) the chlorine/ammonia ratio at the source, and (10) the cleanliness of the construction materials the water mixes with. For these reasons, it is possible for water from a clean source to become contaminated immediately or sometime after its release from the source. It is in these situations that the water damage restoration technician’s preliminary determination can’t determine the Category of water damage and an indoor environmental professional (IEP) assessment becomes necessary. When such a situation arises, building owners and managers have three real options: 

  1. Assume the worst and potentially pay for it;
  2. Assume the least and potentially pay for it; or,
  3. Hire an IEP and have the Category determined through a series of tests. 

In a future blog, I’ll touch on what an IEP assessment might look like. Suffice it to say, for now, that the process is multifaceted to determine things like the water’s cleanliness, the water’s location, the type of building materials impacted, the potential for risk to workers and other building occupants, and the protocol for remediation (i.e., a corrective action plan) where contaminated water is observed. Such a determination of water cleanliness and its potential to cause harm to occupying persons may include a single-phased laboratory analysis of sample(s) collected by the IEP or may include a multi-phase laboratory analysis... For example, when a known sewage backup has occurred and the extent of its impact on the indoor environment is needed, a simple sewage-screening analytical method may be appropriate; however, if a question arises over whether a Category 1, 2 or 3 water damage exists due to a potential or suspected source or deterioration of water (e.g., water entering through the roof during a hurricane), a multi-phase laboratory approach (e.g., sewage-screening, Heterotrophic Plate Count (HPC), and/or Bacteria Genus ID per organism (BGI)) may be required to reliably determine whether the waterborne pathogens are present, to what extent, and to what risk exists in the impacted rooms. 

If you find yourself in a situation where a preliminary determination can’t determine the Category of water damage in your home or office, contact Gulf Coast Center for Indoor Air Quality Services and let’s discuss how we can serve you. 

Air sampling for mold in Tallahassee, Panama City Beach, Destin, Pensacola, Jacksonville, Florida.
By Jason Yost January 22, 2025
“How reliable are air samples [for mold]?” This is an excellent question and one that deserves more transparency:
Importance of proper sampling and laboratory analysis during mold assessments
By Jason Yost January 22, 2025
The type of sampling and lab analysis performed should be directly related to the purpose of the assessment. This blog will introduce you to the most used ways laboratories analyze samples for mold.
What's the difference between the types of mold sampling? Let's talk about that.
By Jason Yost January 22, 2025
The type of sampling and analysis performed should be directly related to the purpose of the assessment. This blog will introduce you to the different ways to sample for mold.
Has the IICRC S520, Mold Remediation Standard, Lost Its Relevance?
By Jason Yost October 1, 2024
With the latest changes to the IICRC S520, has the mold remediation standard lost its relevance? We'll talk about that in this blog.
Mold remediator should not perform mold assessments.
By Jason Yost July 24, 2024
In this blog, I'll answer some of the questions that I've received since publishing parts 1 and 2 on this topic.
Should mold remediators perform mold assessments?
By Jason Yost July 17, 2024
In part 2 of this series, we'll look at a bait and switch risk one takes when hiring a mold remediator to perform mold assessments.
Consumer Products Safety Commission Report on Nanoparticles in Consumer Products & the IAQ
By Jason Yost June 3, 2024
Do nanoparticles in consumer products pose an indoor air quality risk? Let's talk about that.
How the
By Jason Yost April 29, 2024
In this blog, we discuss how the mold assessor/remediator arrangement (discussed in part 1) injures property owners, managers, and insurers.
Free Mold Inspection Scams
By Jason Yost April 17, 2024
What does a company mean when they say "Get Your Free Mold Inspection"? Is there such a thing? In this blog, we'll discuss how to avoid the liabilities that come with this scam.
recommendations and protocols for IAQ concerns and mold
By Jason Yost March 12, 2024
It's important to know what your indoor environmental quality assessor will provide you after the assessment, a recommendation or protocol. In this blog we'll explain the difference between the two and how each may impact you.
More Posts
Share by: