Blog Layout

Are The Chemicals Used During Water Damage Restoration and Mold Remediation Safe And Necessary?

Jason Yost • November 22, 2022

Are The Chemicals Used During Water Damage Restoration and Mold Remediation Safe And Necessary?

Biocides are toxic chemicals or physical agents capable of killing or inactivating one or more groups of microorganisms, such as vegetative bacteria, vegetative fungi, bacterial spores, fungal spores, mycobacteria, parasites, and viruses. Some examples of these may include chlorine, ethanol, or isopropyl alcohol. 

Today, there are over 8,000 biocides for environmental use that are registered as pesticides with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These biocides are mostly aqueous formulations (i.e., formed of matter deposited in or by water) that function as sanitizers, disinfectants, or sterilants designed to kill microorganisms to varying degrees. 

But is the use of these biocides enough to rid you of a mold infestation; are they safe; and are they necessary on mold remediation and water damage restoration projects? Let’s look at these questions by educating ourselves on what biocides are and what they do: 

biocide use on mold remediation projects

When anyone is seeking to use a biocide, there are a few factors that must be considered: 

  1. Consider the nature of the organism; its type and the extent of contamination. 
  2. Consider biocide effectiveness and suitability for the application you want to use it. 
  3. Consider the hazard posed by the biocide you intend to use. 

When a biocide gets registered with the EPA, the product will have a label providing useful information regarding usage, ingredients, safety, and precautionary statements, claims the manufacturer makes for the product, among other things. Label claims are approved following EPA review of efficacy data generated using standard methods such as those by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Since testing is standardized, claims by the manufacturer are not based on in-use evaluations on the variety of materials and surfaces that may be found in buildings.

Mold growing through anti microbial paint

Keep that in mind because biocide application and effectiveness can be affected by several environmental conditions. Just take a look at this picture. This was taken on a post-mold remediation verification assessment that I performed. That's mold growth through an EPA registered anti-microbial paint due to the paint being compromised by some of the environmental conditions below: 

  1. Use concentration: Each has an optimal effectiveness at certain concentrations (e.g., ethanol or isopropyl alcohol can be used effectively at a concentration of 70 – 75%). 
  2. Dwell time (contact time): Most require a dwell time of fifteen minutes to be effective. 
  3. pH: Chlorine is more effective on the acid side and less on the alkaline side. If the surrounding environment is alkaline, it can neutralize chlorine. 
  4. Temperature: Benzalkonium chloride becomes less effective against certain microorganisms at lower temperatures for example. 
  5. Nature of the organism: Some species of Penicillium are known to accumulate copper and can be resistant to copper containing biocides. 
  6. Moisture Levels: Elevated moisture in or on the surface where a biocide is applied may neutralize the anti-microbial properties of the product, as is the case with the anti-microbial paint in the picture. When the remediators applied the paint to the surfaces, they failed to assure the moisture levels in and on the surfaces were dry enough to prevent neutralization of the anti-microbial properties in the paint. According to the manufacturer, there are properties in the paint that become foodstuff for mold once the anti-microbial properties are neutralized.

While it is true that biocide usage may be effective in killing microorganisms if applied properly and can be easy to apply, topical applications, there’s even more to consider… Biocides are toxic chemicals, which means they have low to high toxicity to humans; after all, they are life-killing (bio-life; cide-kill) agents. And re-emissions can be harmful (e.g., aldehydes and chlorine emissions). 

Additionally, biocides can be inactivated by organic material; have limited efficacy against a broad range of microorganisms; may react with or damage some building components; left-over organics may be a nutrient source; and they are not capable of neutralizing the antigenic properties, endotoxins, or mycotoxins left over by bacteria or mold. 

Think of it like this: You go into your living room and see what appears to be mold on the drywall. There is some greenish-blue and black growth here and there. You go to clean it with bleach, but the bleach is only effective in suppressing one of the mold types there. The suppression of the one organism may give the other organism(s) an advantage, leading to different control problems.

OR

You treat the mold with your chlorine, and it kills the mold growth you see, leaving behind the dead bodies, spores, and potential toxins. In other words, the source of indoor air quality damage has not been removed and the potential for exposure to allergens or other infectious agents may remain even after a successful treatment with a biocide. 

With that in mind the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) states, “Effective remediation of water-damaged or microbially contaminated buildings involves (a) the use of appropriate techniques to promote rapid drying, and (b) complete removal of contaminated materials rather than the applications of biocides without these steps.” (ACGIH, Bioaerosols: Assessment and Control) 

Are these products necessary during remediation work? Not usually. Technology today has made it possible to use safe processes to remove mold colonization (i.e., mold growth). (In the future, I’ll talk more about what mold remediation should focus on instead of treating environments with known, suspect, or potential mold growth.) That said, let’s look at what some other standards and guidelines have to say about biocide usage: 

  • The Institute of Inspection, Cleaning, and Restoration Certification (IICRC) standards of care are the go-to standards in the industries of water damage restoration and mold remediation. These standards state, “Source removal of mold contamination should always be the primary means of remediation. The indiscriminate use of antimicrobial products, coatings, sealants, and cleaning chemicals is not recommended.”
  • Before the IICRC’s standards, many professionals turned to the New York City Department of Health’s guidelines, which include statements like, “The use of gaseous, vapor-phase, or aerosolized biocides for remedial purposes is not recommended. The use of biocides in this manner can pose health concerns for people in occupied spaces of the building and for people returning to the treated space if used improperly.”
  • For decades the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) has been considered one of the best resources to go to when looking for scientifically based information on safety and health. The AIHA has come out with guidelines that state, “The goal of remediation is removal of mold and the moisture source because: a) biocides do not alter mycotoxins or allergens; b) it is generally not possible to get 100 percent kill with biocides; and c) because of the newly deposited spores, re-growth will occur after the biocides if moisture returns.”
  • The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has authority to regulate workplace safety and health (e.g., workers on water damage and mold remediation projects). They have come out with guidelines that state, “The use of a biocide, such as chlorine bleach, is not recommended as a routine practice during mold remediation, although there may be instances where professional judgment may indicate its use (for example, when immuno-compromised individuals are present). In most cases, it is not possible or desirable to sterilize an area, as a background level of mold spores comparable to the level in outside air will persist. However, the spores in the ambient air will not cause further problems if the moisture level in the building has been corrected. Biocides are toxic to animals and humans, as well as to mold.”

A professional Indoor Environmentalist or Hygienist can help you identify the nature of the organism and the extent of contamination, some even write protocols (i.e., a corrective action plan) in their reports. When looking for one of these professionals to help consult you through a problem, look for someone that has the following credentials: 

  1. Make sure they do not remediate their own work, as this is a conflict of interest.
  2. Make sure they are insured.
  3. Other than compliance with Florida’s license laws, third-party accreditation is strongly recommended.
  4. Understand what to expect from their work.
  5. Make sure to get a protocol written into your report; otherwise, you may walk away with incomplete information and contractor controversy.

For more on what to look for in a mold assessment, check out my previous blog on the subject. And contact us to learn more about how Gulf Coast Center for Indoor Air Quality Services can serve you with your mold assessment and consultation needs.

Has the IICRC S520, Mold Remediation Standard, Lost Its Relevance?
By Jason Yost October 1, 2024
With the latest changes to the IICRC S520, has the mold remediation standard lost its relevance? We'll talk about that in this blog.
Mold remediator should not perform mold assessments.
By Jason Yost July 24, 2024
In this blog, I'll answer some of the questions that I've received since publishing parts 1 and 2 on this topic.
Should mold remediators perform mold assessments?
By Jason Yost July 17, 2024
In part 2 of this series, we'll look at a bait and switch risk one takes when hiring a mold remediator to perform mold assessments.
Consumer Products Safety Commission Report on Nanoparticles in Consumer Products & the IAQ
By Jason Yost June 3, 2024
Do nanoparticles in consumer products pose an indoor air quality risk? Let's talk about that.
How the
By Jason Yost April 29, 2024
In this blog, we discuss how the mold assessor/remediator arrangement (discussed in part 1) injures property owners, managers, and insurers.
Free Mold Inspection Scams
By Jason Yost April 17, 2024
What does a company mean when they say "Get Your Free Mold Inspection"? Is there such a thing? In this blog, we'll discuss how to avoid the liabilities that come with this scam.
recommendations and protocols for IAQ concerns and mold
By Jason Yost March 12, 2024
It's important to know what your indoor environmental quality assessor will provide you after the assessment, a recommendation or protocol. In this blog we'll explain the difference between the two and how each may impact you.
By Jason Yost January 25, 2024
When you hear someone say they’re “certified”, what does that mean to you? Well, here in the southeastern United States (U.S.), it has come to mean a lot of different things, many of which have nothing to do with being certified. These scams have hurt a lot of people and businesses, which has led to us writing this blog.
Stachybotrys Mold and Health Effects
By Jason Yost November 16, 2023
In this blog, we'll discuss the truth about Stachybotrys and its health effects as well as give you some direction on what to do if you think you have a problem in your home or workplace.
Health effects of inhaled materials
By Jason Yost November 1, 2023
Can this inhaled material cause these symptoms or illnesses? We get asked that a lot. In this blog, we'll discuss this question and why it's important during an indoor air quality assessment.
More Posts
Share by: